PRESS


Joni Mitchell Accuses Bob Dylan of Plagiarism
“Bob [Dylan] is not authentic at all. He’s a plagiarist, and his name and voice are fake. Everything about Bob is a deception. We are like night and day, he and I.” — Joni Mitchell, Los Angeles Times, April 22, 2010


http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2010/04/28/folk-lies-joni-mitchell-outs-bob-dylan/

 

 

Excerpt from Lo and Behold

Julie Levine

Additionally, ruling that a qualified reporter’s privilege existed regarding an interview Dylan gave where he claimed he had writer’s block demonstrates the willingness of courts to protect the big name musician instead of the original composer, thereby endorsing a minor form of plagiarism.
However, protecting Bob Dylan in this one instance may differ in a case where the musician is not well known or does not have a reputation of borrowing from other musicians since the beginning of his career. Indeed, Bob Dylan disclaiming he has writer’s block can give rise to an inference for a reasonable jury to believe that it is more likely that he copied Damiano’s song if the jury heard that he had writer’s block, as compared to the jury not hearing that he had writer’s block.
Therefore, by deeming the requested evidence in the motion to compel irrelevant, it is not clear whether or not Bob Dylan did in fact plagiarize James Damiano’s song or was merely influenced by his music.
Hence, if Damiano’s musicologist’s theory had been presented to the court and was believed as true, it is very possible that Bob Dylan plagiarized James Damiano’s song.
On the other hand, if a contrary theory was presented, one that does not involve the Schenker analysis, it is possible that Bob Dylan was only influenced by Damiano’s song and used that influence to write Dignity, not to copy Steel Guitars as his own.
Nevertheless, it is still unclear whether the court endorsed Bob Dylan’s potential plagiarism because of whom he was or if the court was willing to turn a blind eye to the alleged plagiarism.
This court’s behavior further demonstrates how a court tolerating the use of another’s song may give an incentive to plagiarize. If a court is willing to dismiss a motion to compel discovery that could prove plagiarism, a court may very well do the same for another musician, even if he or she is not as well known as Bob Dylan.


Cordozo Law Journal Article

Lo and Behold

                                                                                               Author

Julie Levine


Link to Lo and Behold

http://www.cardozoaelj.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Levine-32-3.pdf
http://www.cardozoaelj.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Levine-32-3.pdf

 

 

L.Peter Parcher

The Attorney Who Ruined Bob Dylan's Reputation link below

 The following article displays the massive affinity Bob Dylan had for Plagiarism

 

 

 

Trailer to "Bob Dylan's Stealing of James Damiano's Songs"

 

Narrating Christine Boutsikaris

 

 

 

 This is the true story that your

Mainstream Media has hidden from you


Eleven Years


The Producers Club 

358 W 44th St, New York, NY 10036

(212) 315-4743

exhuberant_justice@yahoo.com


"Eleven Years"

Narrating Christine Boutsikaris

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

exhuberant_justice@yahoo.com